{"id":2108,"date":"2026-10-17T11:02:25","date_gmt":"2026-10-17T08:02:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.pexa.com.tr\/robotik\/"},"modified":"2026-10-17T11:11:21","modified_gmt":"2026-10-17T08:11:21","slug":"robotik","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.pexa.com.tr\/en\/robotik\/","title":{"rendered":"Robotics"},"content":{"rendered":"

PEXa Teknoloji \u00b7 Robotics<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Physical AI in education<\/h1>\n\n\n\n

Physical AI is artificial intelligence with a body that senses, speaks and moves. In education, this means not an app on a screen but a robot sitting at the same desk as the student, explaining lessons, asking questions and giving feedback.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"Masada<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

What does the science say?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

A 2024 meta-analysis bringing together 147 studies that measured the effect of social robots on learning gives three clear results:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

d = 0.75<\/div>
Learning with a robot, compared with no intervention<\/div>
Meta-analysis of 147 studies (de Winter et al., 2024)<\/div><\/div>
d = 0.88<\/div>
When teacher and robot teach together<\/div>
The highest effect in the same meta-analysis<\/div><\/div>
d \u2248 0<\/div>
Robot alone, compared with a teacher<\/div>
Average \u22120.07: the robot does not replace the teacher<\/div><\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

In short, the evidence shows that robots deliver the most benefit when used not instead of<\/strong> the teacher, but alongside<\/strong> the teacher.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Why does physical presence make a difference?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Science Robotics<\/em> published a comprehensive review (Belpaeme et al., 2018) reporting that social robots improve both cognitive and affective learning outcomes and achieve results close to human tutoring in restricted tasks. According to the authors, the main reason for this effect is the robot’s physical presence: something traditional learning technologies lack.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Two further findings point the same way:<\/p>\n\n\n\n